But Pasteur’s most significant contribution came from his experiments on germs, which permanently ended the debate with spontaneous generation. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Gradle H. Bacteria and the Germ Theory of Disease: BiblioBazaar, LLC, 2008 pp 38-43. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. The broth in the first flask remained as it is; whereas the broth in the second flask became cloudy which indicated microbial growth. It usually involves arguing that Louis Pasteur's model of infectious disease was wrong, and that Antoine Béchamp's was right. He further investigated fermentation processes for several other compounds like lactic acid, butyric acid, etc. Such tiny living things, which we know today as microorganisms, were first observed by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, way back in the 1670s. Germ theory considers all types of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoansas germs and they are responsible for diseases in humans, animals, and othe… It is claimed that ‘germs’ multiply within the cells of the host and that this can precipitate an excess level of ‘cell death’ that is said to be an indicator of disease. Germ Theory treats the symptoms of the fish and ignores the dirty water. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs.”. Learn about the different types of biology degrees, schools, and jobs available for Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Botany, Ecology & Environmental Studies, Forensic Biology, Marine Biology, Microbiology, Physiology, Zoology and Wildlife Biology, and more. But as this article and our book clearly reveal, there is no evidence to substantiate such claims. This lie is a particular viewpoint about disease called The Germ Theory. One of these sources is Dr M.L. One of his simplest but most significant and ingenious experiments that proved this premise has been illustrated below. But this explanation is highly problematic. It was only in the 1860s that this proposition was strongly backed by evidence that came from the experiments by Louis Pasteur, followed by pioneering studies by Robert Koch and Joseph Lister. S. Microbes and Society: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2007, pp 24-28 While there seems to be no proof that Plenciz had a microscope, or knew of Leenwenhoek’s animalcula, both are possible, and likely, as he was quite prominent; and he, rather than Pasteur, should have any credit that might come from such a discovery – if the germ theory … Many people assume that viruses, bacteria and other germs cause most of … The germ theory of disease states that certain diseases are caused by specific germs or infectious agents. It is for this reason that we urge everyone reading this to understand that the ‘germ theory’ has no basis in real science. It may even be necessary to abandon a theory if it is shown to be unsupported by empirical evidence. In the fear of contracting germs, Louis Pasteur never shook hands with anybody, not even the kings and queens. But it was the laboratory researches of Louis Pasteur in the 1860s and then Robert Koch in the following decades that provided the scientific proof for germ theory. Before Pasteur, many Scientists believed that air can convert sugar into alcohol. His pioneering studies laid the foundation for the modern-day understanding of diseases, their etiology as well as vaccine development. And yet, conclusions are constantly drawn – and then passed straight on to the production of medications and vaccines.”. You can read more on what is biogenesis in…, Darwin's theory of natural selection states that nature selects organisms that have features favorable for their survival, while eliminating inferior species. The papers submitted by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch regarding their observations and therapeutic suggestion with respect to anthrax, constitute the first formal representations of the germ theory of diseases. The vast majority of people around the world believe that the healthcare system promoted by the agencies responsible for public health, especially the WHO, is firmly based on ‘sound science’. We hope you are enjoying Biologywise! He was notthe first to propose that diseases were caused by microscopic organisms, but the view was controversial in the 19th century, and opposed the accepted theory of “spontaneous generation”. According to this theory, life originated spontaneously from inanimate objects. References:DEAN, C. – Death by Modern MedicineDUESBERG, P. – Inventing The AIDS VirusENGELBRECHT, T & Köhnlein, C. – Virus ManiaLESTER, D. & Parker D. – What Really Makes You Ill? In fact, the research we conducted for our book, What Really Makes You Ill? Although this statement will be regarded as highly controversial and even outrageous, its veracity can be demonstrated. He further developed Edward Jenner’s idea of vaccination, and was the first to develop and use an artificially weakened microbe as vaccine in the form of rabies vaccine. This is important to understand because if you want to have healthy children, you need to have an empowering framework regarding what makes them sick. Dawn Lester and David Parker spent more than ten years investigating the real reasons that people become ill using an unbiased and logical approach that enabled them to follow the evidence with open minds. Much famous was the recipe for mice, which stated that a fully grown mice can be created from an old cloth and rotting wheat in mere 21 days. This explanation exposes the fundamental error in conducting laboratory research without an adequate understanding of the living organism that is the human body, as they further state, “Another important question must be raised: even when a supposed virus does kill cells in a test-tube (in vitro) … can we safely conclude that these findings can be carried over to a living organism (in vivo)?”. It may even be necessary to abandon a theory if it is shown to be unsupported by empirical evidence. Despite widespread acceptance of Pasteur’s germ theory, one germ for each disease, there were enough scientists who accepted the pleomorphism theory of microbial organisms, changing perhaps from helpful, benign, to pathogenic according to their immediate organic environments, or inner terrain. The next foundation, a remarkable development in human thought, is the germ theory of disease. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. The germ theory of fermentation: The discovery of the germ theory of fermentation offered proof of biogenesis and disproved spontaneous generation. On the other hand, dust particles easily fell in the second flask, thereby introducing microbes into the broth. Second, you take a sample of the germ from an infected organism and grow it in a pure culture, completely free of … Later, Agostino Bassi in the early 1800’s conducted a series of experiments which demonstrated that a disease afflicting silkworms at the time was caused by a parasite. There are a number of sources that provide a corroboration of the assertion that the ‘germ theory’ lacks any original scientific proof. Terrain Theory Vs Germ Theory (Rockefeller Boondoggle) Terrain Theory Vs Germ Theory (Rockefeller Boondoggle) Henry Makow. This system, known as ‘modern medicine’, is perceived to represent an ‘elite’ branch of science, which suggests that any other approach to healthcare and healing must be pseudoscience or quackery. "Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, in human beings of whom they know nothing." That theory of disease is the reigning premise which justifies a tremendous network of modern medical procedures. In the 1800s, this idea was not widely accepted, and it took a series of experiments and hard work for Pasteur to prove that air contains infinitely small living organisms, and that these organisms are responsible for diseases. Yet in the case of the ‘germ theory’ that ‘proof’ does not exist; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively proves that any ‘germ’ causes any specific infectious disease. They are visible only under microscopes. Although the germ theory has long been considered proved, its full implications for medical practice were not immediately apparent; bloodstained frock coats were considered suitable operating-room attire even in the late 1870s, and surgeons operated without masks or head coverings as late as the 1890s. Laboratory experimentation is certainly used within modern medicine, but it would be a mistake to equate such experiments with ‘science’; as Dr Peter Duesberg explains in his book entitled Inventing the AIDS Virus, “The transition from small to big to mega-science has created an establishment of skilled technicians but mediocre scientists, who have abandoned real scientific interpretation and who even equate their experiments with science itself.”.